Showing posts with label pilar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pilar. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/29/huam-zoo-paris-exhibition

Paris show unveils life in human zoo      
Sense of shock as exhibition reveals how people were displayed in freak shows in the 19th and early 20th centuries.    in Paris    .  guardian.co.uk, Article history

Human zoo

Models of heads of Botoduco men on display at the Quai Branly museum in Paris. Photograph: Remy de la Mauviniere/AP

Half-naked Africans made to gnaw bones and presented as "cannibals" as they shivered in a mock tribal village in northern France; Native American children displayed at fairgrounds; families from Asia and the South Pacific behind railings in European zoos and dancing Zulus on the London stage.
Paris's most talked-about exhibition of the winter opened on Tuesday with shock and soul-searching over the history of colonial subjects used in human zoos, circuses and stage shows, which flourished until as late as 1958.

Human Zoos: The Invention of the Savage, curated by former French international footballer turned anti-racism campaigner Lilian Thuram, traces the history of a practice which started when Christopher Columbus displayed six "Indians" at the Spanish royal court in 1492 and went on to become a mass entertainment phenomenon in the 19th and early 20th centuries.

Millions of spectators turned out to see "savages" in zoos, circuses, mock villages and freak shows from London to St Louis, Barcelona to Tokyo. These "human specimens", and "living museums" served both colonialist propaganda and scientific theories of so-called racial hierarchies.

The exhibition at Paris's Quai Branly – Jacques Chirac's museum dedicated to once-colonised cultures – is the first to look at this international phenomenon as a whole. It brings together hundreds of bizarre and shocking artefacts, ranging from posters for "Male and Female Australian Cannibals" in London, which was the world capital of such stage shows, to documentation for mock villages of "Arabs" and "Sengalese", or juggling tribeswomen in France, which was renowned for its extensive human zoos. Thuram, who was born on the French Caribbean island Guadaloupe, said the exhibition explained the background of racist ideas and "fear of the 'other'" which persisted today.

"You have to have the courage to say that each of us has prejudices, and these prejudices have a history," Thuram explained. He said he was appalled that Hamburg zoo still had sculptures of Indians and Africans at its entrance, a sign that humans as well as animals were on display.

The exhibition reflects a trend in France to re-examine the exploitation of people for entertainment. The recent film Black Venus by acclaimed director Abdellatif Kechiche told the 19th-century story of Saartjie Baartman, a Khoikoi woman from South Africa, who was displayed in London and Paris as the "Hottentot Venus". Londoners derided her as "Fat Bum".

In 1906, Congolese pygmy Ota Benga was exhibited in a cage at the monkey house at New York's Bronx zoo, causing a controversy before he was put in an orphanage for "coloureds". He later shot himself. A hairy woman from Laos, known as "Krao", was exhibited at the end of the 19th century as "the missing link" between man and orangutan.

William Henry Johnson, an African American child with a small cranium, was bought from his parents aged four, exhibited in a hairy suit and made to grunt. The show was titled What Is It?

The exhibition traces the lives of up to 35,000 people put on show in mock tribal scenes and taken to villages or zoos. In 1931, the great-grandparents of Thuram's World Cup team-mate Christian Karembeu came to Paris from New Caledonia. They considered themselves ambassadors but were displayed in a cage at the Jardin d'Acclimation in Paris. They were later shown in Germany, along with about 100 other New Caledonian Kanaks and described as "cannibals".

The phenomenon began to decline in the 1930s with changing public interest and the advent of cinema. The last "living spectacles" were Congo villagers exhibited in Belgium in 1958.

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Visual Anthropology Final Paper

ASSIGNMENT: Write a 6-8pp paper with an original thesis that addresses key debates in ethnographic and/or indigenous film and video. 

Papers should be double-spaced, 1” margins, Times New Roman. Use in-text citations e.g. (Rau 2007:196) and a bibliography (MLA, APA, Chicago Manual, etc.).

DUE: Tuesday 12/6  -  Thesis, title, and bibliography
DUE: Tuesday 12/20  -  Final paper (Final exam day)

Develop your thesis/argument with reference to the readings and at least 4 of the films and filmmakers discussed in parts II and III of the course (Mead & Bateson, Marshall, Rouch, Asch & Chagnon, Kildea & Leach, the MacDougalls, Apak Angilirq, and/or Masayesva (Flaherty is ok too)).

Your bibliography must contain at least 7 references. You are encouraged to find relevant sources in addition to the course readings (See the syllabus for sources). You must cite at least one reading from Loizos and Ruby.

There are many acceptable ways to organize this essay (e.g. I expect your theses/central arguments to focus on anything from technological to feminist concerns); but, consider the following:
·        What are some of the key debates in documentary film and ethnographic representation?
·        How did the filmmakers address ethical debates surrounding the representation of cultural Others?
·        To what extent do the films succeed in goals such as: eliminating bias (and what kinds of bias), being inter-subjective, being objective, representing the “truth,” being non-exploitative, having equal power relations, representing ethnographic subjects as “co-eval,” and/or resisting the tendency to “essentialize” or “exoticize” their subjects?
·        How did the historical context and other discourses (intellectual, artistic, popular culture, political, scientific, etc.) affect the production and interpretation of these films?
·        How did the availability of technology and technological innovation impact representational practices and their circulation?

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Etra credit / Jersey Shore Studies Conference - U.Chicago.

Just to reiterate, we decided that you can make up one missed blog posting by writing an intelligent posting about the Jersey Shore or another reality TV show from the perspective of Visual Anthropology. This is not required. It is extra-credit.

This is serious stuff! The University of Chicago is hosting a Jersey Shore Studies conference next week. See for yourself.

http://www.striking.ly/s/pages/jersey-shore-conference

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Visual Anthropology Prompt.

You can use the following prompt to guide your writing process, *or* you can supply your own prompt, as long as it meets the objectives of 1) demonstrating your mastery of the material from the Part I of the class and 2) causing you to reflect on how this knowledge may affect how you interpret the Ethnographic and Indigenous films the we will be watching.
Please bring your print out to class. In lieu of a timed- writing, we'll do a peer-review of the papers. Send me the final draft by Sunday morning (preferably sooner) so I can grade them by Tuesday.
Make sure your essay has a thesis statement that you support in the subsequent paragraphs.

Papers should be 4-5pp, double-spaced, 1” margins, Times New Roman.
Use in-text citations and a bibliography (MLA, APA, Chicago Manual, etc. are all fine.)


PROMPT
Drawing on the readings and films assigned during weeks 1-4, describe turn-of-the-century Western paradigms of collecting art and culture and discuss how they inform contemporary practices regarding the visual representation of “Other” cultures.

Be sure to situate these visual discourses in their historical context in terms of:
·        Cultural context: What other visual discourses made representations and displays of exotic cultures meaningful to audiences?
·        Political-economic context: What was going on during this period and how was it related to these practices?
·        Social Context: How did social concerns within Western societies affect the public reception of these productions?
·        Scientific/Technological Context: How did scientific discourses and the availability of technology during this era impact representational practices and their circulation?

Sunday, October 2, 2011

Some questions to think about

Here are some questions to think about with respect to the 2 films on Aboriginal Australians that we are watching.

Which film is the "realistic" film?
Which one is the "ethnographic film"?
Which one is "scripted"?
Which one is "fiction"?
Which one does a better job of representing the culture, aesthetics, and/or point of view of the subjects?